Impact assessment is one of the major drivers in scholarly communication, in particular since the number of available faculty positions and grants has far exceeded the number of applications. Peer review still plays a critical role in evaluating science, but citation-based bibliometric indicators are becoming increasingly important. This chapter looks at a novel set of indicators that can complement both citation analysis and peer review. Altmetrics use indicators gathered in the real-time Social Web to provide immediate feedback about scholarly works. We describe the most important altmetrics and provide a critical assessment of their value and limitations. QUOTE: Good science, original work, always went beyond the body of received opinion, always represented a dissent from orthodoxy. However, then, could the orthodox fairly assess it? Richard Rhodes mod. from Michael Polanyi in “Making of the Atomic Bomb”

External Content (the link will open in a new tab)

Authors: Martin Fenner
Publication year: 2013
Language: English (EN)
Level of knowledge: Introductory: aware of
Usage rights:

Attribution - CC-BY