Facilitate Open Science Training for European Research The default is ‘Open’ Victoria Tsoukala, PhD|National Documentation Centre Alma Swan, PhD|Enabling Open Scholarship Università degli Studi di Trieste, July 7 2015 PART ONE Definitions and descriptions Open Access: the first definition • Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002) • The literature (and data) that scholars give away for free (peer-reviewed but may also include preprints) • Barrier-free (financial, legal, technical and temporal barriers) • To read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles, crawl them for indexing, pass them as data to software, or use them for any other lawful purpose Open Access: a working description • Immediate • Free (to use) • Free (of restrictions) • Access to the peer-reviewed literature (and data) • Not vanity publishing • Not a ‘stick anything up on the Web’ approach • Moving scholarly communication into the Web Age • Open Access part of a wider ongoing conversation about Open Science Open Access – Why? • Research moves faster and more efficiently • Greater visibility and impact • Better monitoring, assessment and evaluation of research • Enables new semantic technologies (text-mining and data-mining) • Publicly-funded research should be freely available to the ‘public’ Open Access – How (to provide OA) • Publishing (the gold route) • Self-archiving (the green route) Open access publishing (the Gold route) Authors publish their scholarship in open access journals or monograph series. These publications are freely available to the end users on the Internet. Second type most common in the Social Sciences and the Humanities • Copyright is usually retained by the authors******* • Open access publications follow the same processes as toll access publications (i.e. peer review), but provide open access to the content of the publications. • Some open access publishers may charge article processing charges (APC) and most charge Book Processing Charges (BPC) • http://doaj.org registry of open access journals • Open Access monographs (www.doabooks.org) Self-archiving (the Green route) Authors deposit their accepted publication in institutional/subject-based repository at time of publication; they also deposit the research data underlying the publication in a data repository; access and use is free; license is used • Repository: online database; operates under specific technical standards that allow the institution to manage, preserve, disseminate, showcase its scientific output. • The repository is a valuable tool in an institution’s research information system and evaluation process, and one that offers added value services for the scientific community. • http://opendoar.org registry of repositories • Open Access Research Data (www.re3data.org) Self-archiving and publishing NOT the same thing They are complementary activities • Gold open access is a mode of publishing and follows the processes of publishing • Purpose of self-archiving is to curate one’s scientific output in the repository and provide access to them; it is not publishing • But…. Repositories DO open new potential paths for research dissemination, overlay repositories Significance of author copyright and licensing in open access • Author usually maintains copyright (does not sign away) • Important that author license their work-in this way, user knows what they can do with it • Standard licenses legalized worldwide (ie embedded in local national law): creative commons • https://creativecommons.org/ OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHING (GOLD ROUTE) JOURNALS, MONOGRAPHS, RESEARCH DATA Open Access journals • Free to the reader • Many (most) are free to publish in too – Some charge APCs (article processing charges) • There are around 10 000 open access journals • They are listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) Example journal Open Access Monographs • Free to the reader • Typical to publish in the SSH • Fees required by most publishers • Numerous publishing initiatives, especially in the SSH • Unknown number of books in open access • www.doabooks.org OPEN ACCESS REPOSITORIES (GREEN ROUTE) Publication repositories, data repositories Open Access repositories • Digital collections • Usually institutional (based in universities) • Sometimes centralised (subject-based) • Interoperable (technically the same, they can communicate) • Form a network across the world • Create a global database of openly-accessible research • Currently c2900 By country Italy: 74 repositories Here’s one Data repositories • Deposit your research data at the same time with publication • Institutional or subject-based • Important: they curate data, they provide DOIs – Data can be cited, becoming very valuable output by itself, worthy of citing • Important: linking publications with underlying data – Open access to research data is doing ethical research • New field: data science, data intensive research Linking publications and data • Data that supports research publications should also be open • Deposit the research data of your publication in an appropriate repository (a trusted repository) • Publish your article/book, preferably in open access-provide a link to the deposited research data • Deposit your article/book in your institutional repository or other appropriate repository. Other ‘Open’ things • As well as Open Access to journal articles ... • Open Books and Monographs • Open Data (tomorrow’s topic) • Open Science: – Open Access to articles – Open Monographs – Open Data – Open licensing – Open innovation – Including – especially important right now – text-mining and data-mining (TDM) PART TWO The benefits of Open Access Benefits for researchers Researcher advantages from Open Access • Access, access, access! • Research intensified • Fast-track to innovation and more research • New collaborations • New paths for research Benefits for authors Author advantages from Open Access • Visibility • Usage • Impact • Personal profiling and marketing Visibility An author’s own testimony on open access visibility “Self-archiving in the PhilSci Archive has given instant world-wide visibility to my work. As a result, I was invited to submit papers to refereed international conferences/journals and got them accepted.” Professor Martin Skitmore School of Urban Design, QUT “There is no doubt in my mind that ePrints will have improved things – especially in developing countries such as Malaysia … many more access my papers who wouldn’t have thought of contacting me personally in the ‘old’ days. While this may … increase … citations, the most important thing … is that at least these people can find out more about what others have done…” Usage University of Liege repository: authors deposit Individual article usage Individual authors’ usage Individual authors’ usage OpenStarTs Impact Citation impact Range = 36%-200% (Data: Stevan Harnad and co-workers) Engineering 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 OA Non-OA Data: Gargouri & Harnad, 2010 Cit ati on s Clinical medicine Cit ati on s Data: Gargouri & Harnad, 2010 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 OA Non-OA Social science Cit ati on s Data: Gargouri & Harnad, 2010 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 OA Non-OA Profiling and marketing Melissa Terras For institutions? “The case for Open Access within a university is not simply political or economic or professional. It needs to rest in the notion of what a university is and what it should be .... It is central to the university’s position in the public space” Professor Martin Hall, Vice Chancellor of the University of Salford, UK Institutional and funder advantages from Open Access • Visibility, usage • Impact • Profiling and marketing • Outreach to the public: demonstrating social return • Economic benefits • Institutional management information “I am asked how many articles my researchers publish each year, and I have to say ‘I have no idea!’” Professor Bernard Rentier, Rector, University of Liege, Belgium, explaining one of the reasons why he has built an institutional Open Access repository and introduced a mandatory policy on Open Access Outreach: the public • Independent researchers • Education sector • Professional community • Practitioner community • Interested ‘lay’ public • Business sector, including innovative SMEs MIT’s repository usage PubMed Central • 2 million full-text articles • c500,000 unique users per day: – 25% universities – 18% government and others – 40% citizens – 17% companies EU CIS studies PART THREE Policy y Open Access policies: the Why • Benefits of open access increasingly understood by policymakers. A long process. – Result: policies • Enabler of innovation, development, citizen-science, transparency in research and research ethics • In the spirit of and aligned to other current policy trends , openness to government information (PSI), Open education, open cultural information, etc. • Public money and access to citizens (=taxpayers) • Result: Tsunami of policies for open access to publications, monographs and research data How this affects you! • Your institution may require obligatory open access, e.g. of your PhD Thesis (UTrieste) • Trend for mandatory open access policies by universities and research funders all over the world – Research funders and research institution usually have separate open access policies for publications and for research data • Your funder may require open access to publications and research data – Horizon 2020 and ERC – Fondazione Cariplo – Telethon – Wellcome Trust – Etc………… – RCUK • Will also ask for a data management plan (DMP) during submission of proposal Policies: worldwide numbers The effect of a mandatory policy Open Access mandates worldwide EuropeNorth America Central & South America Africa Asia Oceania H2020 and Open Access • Mandatory for peer-reviewed publications • ‘Green’ OA mandate (repositories) – Publish as normal in subscription-based journals or open access journals – Place author’s copy in OA repository and provide open access – Deposit this at acceptance for publication, or the latest at publication • ‘Gold’ OA: Permits payments from grants for OA journal publication • Mute on monographs • Definite on data: open data pilot for H2020 Horizon 2020 and Open Access • Mandatory immediate open access to all peer-reviewed publications (up to 12 months delay for SSH) • Mandatory open access to research data for some areas (Open Access Pilot for 2014-2015)-Data Management Plans • Unclear on monographs • Green open access Mandate= must deposit and make open access in repository at the latest at publication time • Gold open access encouragement= encouraged to publish in open access venues=expenses are eligible • ERC special conditions – Does not participate in the Open Access Pilot – Monographs MUST be made open access immediately, the latest in 6Months What to do to comply? • Check your funder policy – They mostly ask for green open access at publication=repository • Check your institutional policy – In general funder policies supersede institutional policies • Select publisher according to disciplinary criteria and according to open access publishing and self-archiving criteria (doaj.org and SherpaRomeo)-funder and institutional policies may affect your choice! • Comply to funder-institution mandate= deposit in repository and provide open access (publications and data) PASTEUR4OA project Facilitating open access policies in Europe http://www.pasteur4oa.eu RECODE project http://recodeproject.eu What should early career researchers do to change the paradigm? • SHARE in repositories • PUBLISH in open access • Maintain your rights • Providing open access is doing ethical research • Be part of the virtuous circle of open science • You are the next generation of professionals that will make open science a reality! Get involved • Right to Research Coalition • OpenCon 2015 in Brussels for young researchers Thank you for listening tsoukala@ekt.gr www.pasteur4oa.eu www.ekt.gr