IPR, Open Science and Technology Transfer | FOSTER

The delicate interplay between ensuring protection of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) and fostering knowledge circulation will be at the core of the workshop 'IPR, Technology Transfer & Open Science - Challenges and opportunities', which will take place on March 9th in Brussels. Starting from the idea that Open Science does not mean 'free science', the participants will discuss the approaches to striking a good balance between protected data and open access to information.

The present Workshop, jointly organised by JRC and DG Research and Innovation, gathers experts in Intellectual Property Rights (IPR), Technology Transfer, Open Science and cloud computing, with a view to analysing the interaction between these elements and, in particular, to understanding to what extent the current European copyright framework is fit for an Open Science setting. The Workshop is expected to result in a set of policy recommendations to be included in a policy brief following discussions.

Background

Open Science represents a new approach to the scientific process based on cooperative work and new ways of knowledge distribution using digital technologies and new collaborative tools; it promotes effective data sharing (i.e as early and broad as possible) and a dynamic exchange of ideas and research results. Compared to traditional research methods where publishing and patenting take precedence over collaboration and sharing, Open Science favours joint efforts and sharing results as early and as widely as possible to engage with broader communities and tackle global challenges more effectively. As a consequence, in principle, no knowledge or discovery is completely "owned", rather shared to benefit society at large.

Besides the social and peer recognition sought by researchers for their work, private research organisations need concrete boost to undertake the risky investments that enable the commercialisation of innovative products. Both aspects require some degree of protection in connection with an original creation or idea, for a limited period of time. IPR have a clear role to play, as a way to incentivise individual efforts and to induce corporate investment.

However, while IPR certainly appear as a vital instrument for research and innovation, its role should not be overstated. Arguably, IPR that are introduced already during the scientific discovery process may inhibit the very collaborative patterns set forth by Open Science. An appropriate level and type of protection should allow to strike the right balance between the incentives needed for an initial creation and the freedom to reuse and improve upon such creation.

Therefore, the following questions are at the core of today's discussion: what amount and type of IPR protection is desirable in an Open Science context? Do we need additional guidance to apply the current IPR framework?

Full Agenda here

Where

Van Maerlant 2 - Rue Van Maerlant 2, Brussels, Belgium

Full details

Organisers: EC JRC & DG Research and Innovation
Language: EN

Topics

Audience

Share

Latest Tweets (#fosteropenscience)

Comments

Interesting topic shown here, i am now working on it regularly here and would say keep the future posts like this continuously.
System Integration service providers
Dejero Live

I’m impressed with your views on this matter and I agree with a lot of your ideas.
B Tech college in Chandigarh
Mechanical Engineering college in Punjab

Both science and technology infer a reasoning procedure, both are worried with causal connections in the material world, and both utilize an exploratory system that outcomes in exact shows that can be confirmed by redundancy (see Scientific Method). Science, from a certain point of view, is less worried with the common sense of its outcomes and more worried with the advancement of general laws, yet by and by science and innovation are inseparably required with each other. Coursework Writers UK. The shifting interchange of the two can be seen in the recorded advancement of such experts as scientists, architects, physicists, cosmologists, woodworkers, potters, and numerous different masters.

The events like IPR, Technology Transfer & Open Science - Challenges and opportunities' are really helpful for the particpants to be aware and discuss about the latest innovations and how to get rid of chapped lips theories. They provide new approach to the scientific process based on cooperative work and new ways of knowledge distribution using digital technologies.